Leave a comment

June 4, 2014 by musehick

I find things like the Bechdel Test a little annoying. I understand that they are addressed to a problem of under-representation, but anything that gets overly prescriptive about what and what should not be in a story is problematic. Judging creative work like this is odd to me – trying to construct an odd pseudo-science that boils everything down to its constituent parts and whether it ticks certain boxes. To me that is not what creative work is about and doesn’t really affect the way I feel about it either. I t would kind of be like relying on that Microsoft Word algorithm to tell you how good your writing is … doesn’t work.

With films I like auteurs; I like imperfect flawed masterpieces – fuck audience-driven survey based films that lack a soul. By committee? Why?

Write strong female characters, let them have conversations – I think that’s great. I love writing that kind of thing. But some stories aren’t going to go there and that doesn’t make them bad or flawed. I know it’s currently an internet hobby-horse but it’s one I hope settles down and finds it’s own place without telling and bullying every story writer into doing things as “they are supposed to be done”.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Nanowrimo 2013


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,052 other followers

Blog Stats

  • 2,184 hits
June 2014
« May   Jul »

Flickr Photos


angels in the angles

sum of the angles are equal to

caught hex

weight a spell

atom eyes

to see differently

the edge witches

where fields end

%d bloggers like this: