Thursday

1

January 11, 2013 by musehick

I have read in pieces by writers better than I where they have claimed that every single picture that an artist paints is in some way a self portrait (I wish I could attribute it, but I can’t, and I sometimes like to pretend that I don’t have Google). If this metaphor can be extended, and as it is my piece of writing, I am going posit that it can – then it could quite easily be argued that every piece of writing by a writer is likewise a self portrait.

Now, I would also like to suggest that in some way every painting reveals an artist’s idea of what painting is, in the techniques employed and the way the art is constructed. You can see where I am going with this, right? That writing likewise often describes in the way it is put together both the writer’s opinion of various techniques and means of construction.

I write here a lot about what I believe art is or writing is – or what it should do; what I think my writing does, and sometimes how well I think I do it. Reading my writing is the best way to explain this though – I do, or aim to do what I think art should do, and I use different techniques in the way I think they should most effectively be employed. The proof is in the pudding.

This has traditionally been my problem with books on how to write – but perhaps it is just that I myself have not found the didactic approach and rule setting as a good way to explore how I think about writing; writing fiction has been my vehicle for exploring and fleshing out the ideas; nominally putting the words in someone else’s mouth and having them be my voice. I paint my self portrait in caricature, but never let the passion and the words of a character blunt the message, I would hope that the person speaking for me is obvious because they are going to be the one positively supporting art and they are more often than not going to be the hero. I don’t often admit that – but the heroic part of me, which I might deny in daily life, is given free reign in my fiction. I am also not afraid to hold up a looking glass to the darker, less admirable parts of myself either – being a writer calls for honesty or the writing will not have any integrity. I aim for integrity. I lay myself bare regularly – if you cannot read it between the lines; read it in the manifest thrust of the work, then you are not really reading what I write and your opinion does not matter to me. Give me a fair go and I am truly open to your communication and would love to hear what you think. I would love to look at your self portraits too.

Advertisements

One thought on “Thursday

  1. I agree on the idea that all art is autobiographical–and reveals a lot about the creator.
    –JW

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Nanowrimo 2013

agrypnotic

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,052 other followers

Blog Stats

  • 2,181 hits
January 2013
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Flickr Photos

Goodreads

whetwork

triggerpull

oppenheim memorial park

away from old eyes

the black vault network

follow the money

hallux and hind collar

flight from the nest

distraction display

sleight of hand

%d bloggers like this: